The view from there

Published 02.28.07
OSLO LOVED IT: "Go see this one!" raves one of the blurbs on a Norwegian poster for USA vs. Al-Arian.

I remember seeing Norwegian filmmaker Line Halvorsen the first week of the Sami Al-Arian trial in 2006 at the back of the media pack that hounded anyone connected to the case as they entered the heavily fortified Sam Gibbons Federal Courthouse. Now Halvorsen has made an often-gripping film that has less to do with American justice than it has to do with one family paying the price for our so-called war on terror.

USA vs. Al-Arian falls short when it bypasses the complexities of the months-long terrorism case against former University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian; Halvorsen instead reports the jury's initial verdict (not guilty on some counts, undecided on nine others) as a complete and total victory for Al-Arian (which it was not). She also opted not to explore the complexities of Al-Arian himself (for years, he denied any association with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad organization, until the trial made it clear he was intimately involved with the group). He was a man with a tragic flaw, in a tragic situation, but she doesn't probe deeply to get us behind Al-Arian's mask.

Instead, given seemingly total access to Al-Arian's wife and children, Halvorsen shows us the disintegration of an All-American family. Nahla is the spouse who must deal with the years of her husband's imprisonment and uncertain future; we see her unravel, at one point digging through bottles of pills after a stressful phone conversation with Sami in jail. The effect on Al-Arian's young son, Ali -- depressed and disconnected at a family meal toward the end of the trial -- is heartbreaking.

If Halvorsen's view is at all anti-American, the last third of her film shows why she (and other European observers) might have arrived at such a stance. The treatment of Al-Arian after the verdict, which cleared him of the most serious charges, is despicable by any standards. His family's hopes are dashed after federal Judge James Moody goes well beyond the plea agreement to sentence Al-Arian to the maximum and to call him a "master manipulator."

Al-Arian sits in a prison in Virginia on a hunger strike today. The film doesn't justify one protester's quote that "this is the major civil rights case of the 21st century." Nahla Al-Arian's assessment mid-film is closer to the truth: "This is just an impossible case."

COMMENTS

RE: The view from there

Posted by Zorro on 05.05.07 @ 05:51 PM

Did Mr Wayne Garcia see the same movie as we in Scandinavia did to-day? Quote: "..for years, he (Al-Aria) denied any association with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad organization, until the trial made it clear he was intimately involved with the group.."! This "intimate involvement" turns out to be same modest help with immigration papers or some such to a palestinian years ago! If Mr Garcia knows more, I challenge him to tell the readers exactly what he is referring to! To any readers: Go see this movie while you can. Political manipulation comes in many forms and varieties in the USA of to-day and is reaching an all time high in the final year of the Bush administration--one variety is brain washed patriotism e. g.--n'est-ce-pas Mr Garcia?

RE: The view from there

Posted by Debbie on 04.26.07 @ 05:35 PM

Ah yes. We know we're dealing with the U.S. media, when a documentary about Sami Al-Arian, a Palestinian who was an outspoken defender of Palestinian rights, ends up being the subject of an Amnesty International critique, only to have his persecution by the US government, twisted by a U.S. journalist. Only in the U.S. can the documentation of the persecution of Palestinians in the U.S. end up being subject to endless "balancing" to ensure that no one dares to speak out too stridently against Israeli policy.

RE: The view from there

Posted by Emile Zarbo on 03.18.07 @ 05:17 PM

Mr. Garcia had the opportunity in his review to discuss the "complexities" of Al-Arian and his case, such as why he feels the failure to be convicted on any of 17 charges is not a total victory, or exactly what he did wrong. He did not do so. As it stands, we are told the film is biased - but we are not told why. That is not much of a defense for the US government. This is a movie that everyone in America should see. And, unfortunately, next to nobody will.

YOUR COMMENT

TOOLS

Save this story Email this story to a friend Print this story
SHARE: